What Ferguson, Eric Garner, and CIA Torture Have in Common

CIA-Torture-Interrogation-Rendition-Guantanamo

(Photo: Shane T. McCoy/Wikimedia)

There’s no better way for Washington to commemorate Human Rights Day than by letting the public finally learn the truth about torture. And there’s no better way for concerned Americans to do so than by raising our voices to challenge the compounding crimes of our lawless agencies.

Washington promised that, after years of stonewalling by the CIA and White House transcending both of the major political parties, we would finally learn some glimmers of truth when the Senate released a heavily redacted summary of its historic 6,000-page report on CIA torture crimes.

The timing could not be more poignant. The report was released on the eve of Human Rights Day, and in the wake of an ongoing, diverse, and energetic national grassroots movement for police accountability.

Parallels between CIA torture and police murders in New York, Ferguson, Cleveland, and elsewhere may be easy to overlook. Unfortunately, both sets of abuses reflect similar patterns: severe crimes committed by powerful people, officially endorsed cover-ups, and formal legal impunity that compounds the original crimes.

This week, on Human Rights Day, people in a dozen U.S. cities will take action to connect these abuses. We insist on nothing more than justice for all, including public servants.

A problem with many faces

CIA torturers and police officers who murder innocent unarmed Americans share one thing in common: impunity for violent crimes that violate global human rights commitments. The impunity they share reveals systems of separate — and unequal — justice across the United States.

Communities responding to impunity for police murders in Ferguson, New York City, and elsewhere across the country seek goals including federal laws to end racial profiling. Incidentally, body cameras are not a solution. They will neither ensure accountability for discrete cases — remember Eric Garner? — nor will they offer even transparency for abusive patterns & practices.

At root, we seek accountability for the arbitrary use of force.

Police violence in our communities is one example. CIA torture, or the Agency’s documented assassination of U.S. citizens (even their children) without trial, is another.

The Senate’s report revealed previously secret details about human rights abuses committed in our names — and with our resources — vastly beyond the little known to this point.

Crimes, whoever commits them

It confirmed, for example, that CIA personnel violated even the illegally permissive limits contrived by the Bush-era Justice Department to enable torture. In other words, the report confirmed that CIA officials broke the law. That’s why it was secret so long.

The illegality of torture is obvious to anyone who recalls the Second World War, when our nation waged a sustained global struggle before sending a Supreme Court Justice to establish the legal precedent that torture is a crime: full stop, with no exceptions.

But the only CIA official to ever face justice related to torture, John Kiriakou, was one who tried to blow the whistle.

Acts of torture are real crimes with actual victims, including U.S. service members who died at the hands of militants inspired by torture to take up arms against the United States. Police murders are also real crimes with actual victims, including surviving families who visited Washington recently to plead for justice.

Failing to indict murderers because they wear a badge is no different than covering up details of torture by government secret agents. In both cases, our system turns a blind eye to crimes by officials — even violent crimes that offend our species’ most fundamental commitments.

Justice in America: Protecting the powerful

In both St. Louis and New York, grand juries swayed by prosecutors masquerading as defense attorneys failed to even indict killer cops — including one caught on videotape, suggesting that proposals for body cameras are a red herring.

Similarly, the CIA’s ongoing history of lies, destruction of evidence, and even espionage against the people’s representatives has allowed grave crimes to go unpunished.

Despite their explicitness, legal prohibitions on torture, or police murdering innocents (or for that matter, our rights once guaranteed under the First and Fourth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution) have been reduced in reality to mere legal formalisms ignored in practice.

Over the past few weeks, I’ve helped peacefully seize shopping malls in St. Louis, occupy Union Station in Washington, DC, and block highways and major intersections because, as a lawyer, I swore an oath to “support the Constitution and laws of the United States.” Senators also swear a similar oath, but violate it every time they decide to “look forwards, not backwards” to ignore official crimes.

I also helped deliver a quarter million petitions to retiring Senator Mark Udall (D-CO), whose seat on the Intelligence Committee has given him a chance to read the secret report and grow outraged by its findings.

When the rest of us come to understand just how far torture extended, we should remember that “power concedes nothing without a demand” and make our voices heard.

Shahid Buttar is a civil rights lawyer and the executive director of the Bill of Rights Defense Committee.

  • robertwgordonesq

    Mr. Buttar, You, as a lawyer who has passed though some fine institutions (Stamford Law School, for example) and having done so well academically, you should really know better (and I assume that deep down you really do and are just posturing to make a point…), but, “murder” is a legal conclusion, as you know, arrived at after a trial, looking at evidence, getting the full story. Not by watching media clips.

    Do you honestly believe that the police officer in Ferguson and the police in New York honestly set out that day with an intent to simply kill someone just for the heck of it?

    And just because a person is “unarmed” doesn’t mean they can’t do serious bodily harm to another.

    It was confirmed in the grand jury testimony that Michael Brown was a thief who used his size to intimidate others and boldly brandished his crime by walking openly with the spoils of his plunder, unhidden in plain view. (see footnote 1) Should such behavior be ignored by the police? Tolerated? Accepted?

    In any event, this does not mean he should have been killed…but your narrative leaves out important details of the story. Portraying him as an “innocent” only discredits your cause.

    —-footnotes—-
    1. (Darren Wilson Grand Jury Transcript) found here: graphics8.nytimes.com/newsgrap… (see pages 519 through 529 of the pdf version of the transcript or page
    31 through 41 of the September 10, 2014 testimony of Dorian Johnson).

    • Guest

      You make some valid points, but both Darren Wilson and the NYPD know that whatever they do, they’ll likely have the law on their side. And it was.

      • robertwgordonesq

        I don’t think it is a given that the police would go free. There was the Abner Louima case in New York and that police officer is still sitting in jail while Mr. Loiuma is a millionaire in Florida. These two cases, Michael Brown and Eric Gardner are really bad cases to rally behind as I think both men were in the wrong to some extent and in the case of Gardner, in addition to resisting the police, he seemed overweight and had asthma which probably contributed to his death. That does not make it right, but that doesn’t make it an “execution” as some people are making out to be.

        Add to that, on or about November 3, 2014, there was a brutal murder of a white man by apparently four black youth in St. Louis, Missouri who used hammers to bash the man’s head in (just Google: Robert Mitchell who was allegedly one of the assailants and Zemir Begic the 32 year old victim who was killed with apparently two hammers while his fiancé watched…some claim the youth yelled racial slurs during the beating…but we won’t know until all the facts come out).

        The incident occurred just 14 miles away from Ferguson.

        So where is the outrage over that incident?

        Don’t “white lives matter” as well?

    • dubinsky

      it seems that Buttar has passed through fine law schools and emerged in the way that much fine food has passed through me and emerged; changed, but not for the better.

  • Lemuel Gulliver

    “Don’t “white lives matter” as well”
    Of course they do, but this discussion is about abuse of power, not about crime itself. Police are important members of society, but, because they have so much power, the bad abusive ones need to be rooted out, not protected. I hope that the many, many good cops would do this, rather than uniting to shelter and protect criminal cops from prosecution. It seems that this is not always the case. The cases in the news now are focal points, not isolated occurrences.