FPIF Column |
Hunting Hugo
Conn Hallinan | October 23, 2006
Editor: Emily Schwartz Greco, IPS
|



|
|
|
There are times when the tensions between Venezuela and the Bush Administration seem closer to Commedia dell'arte than politics. Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez compares President George W. Bush to the devil, right down to the smell of sulfur during a speech at the UN General Assembly. Homeland Security responds by strip-searching Nicolás Maduro Moros, Venezuela's foreign minister, at JFK airport. Venezuela seizes 176 pounds of frozen chicken on its way to the U.S. Embassy in Caracas.
But Recent White House initiatives suggest that the administration has more than tit for tat in mind.
In late June, U.S. Southern Command, the arm of the U.S. military in Latin America, concluded that efforts by Venezuela, Ecuador, and Bolivia to extend state control over their oil and gas reserves posed a threat to U.S. oil supplies. While Latin America produces only 8.4% of the world's oil output, it supplies 30% of the oil consumed in the United States.
“A re-emergence of state control of the energy sector will likely increase inefficiencies and, beyond an increase in short-term profits, will hamper efforts to increase long-term supplies and production,” the study concludes. In an interview with the Financial Times, Col. Joe Nunez, a professor of strategy at the U.S. Army War College, added an observation that ought to send a collective chill down the backs of the three countries named: “It is incumbent upon the Command to contemplate beyond strictly military matters.”
That one of the U.S. military's most powerful arms should find itself deep in the energy business should hardly come as a surprise. Four months after Bush took office, Vice President Dick Cheney's National Energy Policy Development Group recommended that the administration “make energy security policy a priority of our trade and foreign policy.” The Administration has faithfully followed that blueprint, using war and muscular diplomacy to corner U.S. energy supplies in the Middle East and Central Asia.
What most Americans don't know is that Venezuela's reserves are enormous. According to a department of energy estimate, they are considerably greater than Saudi Arabia's, and may be as high as 1.3 trillion barrels. Most Venezuelan oil is heavy and expensive to refine, but as long as oil stays above $50 a barrel—and few doubt it will go lower—it is an almost endless gold mine.
The bone the U.S. is picking with Hugo is not about bombast. It's about oil.
Shortly after Southern Command's report, the White House appointed J. Patrick Maher, a 32-year Central Intelligence Agency veteran, to head up a special task force for gathering intelligence on Venezuela and Cuba. The only other similar posts are for North Korea and Iran, members of the so-called “axis of evil” reportedly developing nuclear weapons. In a move that almost exactly parallels how intelligence was handled in the run up to the Iraq War, as “Mission Manager,” Maher will bypass the CIA and report directly to Bush.
Maher's appointment followed a full court press by a group of neoconservatives grouped around National Security Director John Negroponte, then-CIA chief Porter Goss, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, and her deputy, Robert Zoellick.
The campaign against Chavez on the executive side is matched by a similar push in Congress. Senator Richard Lugar (R-IN), chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, recently urged the Bush administration to adopt “contingency plans” in case of a disruption of oil supplies from Venezuela. In a July letter to Rice, the senator said that Venezuela has an “undue ability to impact USA security and our economy.” Lugar went on to warn that there was a “real risk” that Venezuela could “act in concert” with other countries and that “we have a responsibility to plan appropriate contingencies that protect the American people.”
The current campaign against Chavez is really Round Two in the White House's drive to unseat him. As Freedom of Information Act documents reveal, the Bush administration already tried to overthrow Chavez in an April 2002 coup.
Otto Reich, then assistant secretary of state for Western Hemispheric Affairs, met several times with coup leaders. Rogelio Pardo-Maurer, deputy secretary of defense for Western Hemispheric Affairs, met with military coup leader Gen. Lucas Romero Rincon. Cuban exile Reich and Pardo-Maurer were major players in the 1980s Contra war against Nicaragua. Pardo-Maurer was the Contras' most visible Washington spokesman back then and Reich was forced to resign from his job as head of public diplomacy in the Reagan administration's State Department for planting false stories in the U.S. media.
The CIA, through the National Endowment for Democracy and the United States Agency for International Development, bankrolled Chavez's opponents, and helped organize and support the strike by white collar oil workers and ships captains eight months after the coup collapsed.
Since then, the Bush administration has kept up a drumbeat of attacks. Rice warned that Chavez was “a major threat to the region.” U.S. Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld compared Chavez to Adolph Hitler. Zoellick told senators that Chavez was part of a new “creeping authoritarianism.” In March, a National Security Strategy document charged that Chavez was “undermining democracy.” At an Oct. 2 meeting of Latin American defense ministers in Managua, Nicaragua, Gen. Bantz J. Craddock of the Southern Command called Chavez a “destabilizing” force in the region.
What really worries the U.S. is that Chavez is trying to diversify Venezuela's clientele. Venezuela is currently building a $335 million pipeline across Colombia in order to ship more oil to China, and is working on plans for a $20 billion natural gas pipeline through the Amazon and on to markets in Chile, Brazil, Uruguay, and Argentina.
China is pouring in billions to develop fields in Venezuela, Bolivia, and Ecuador to give it the inside corner on future resources. The “China connection” is one that concerns the Bush administration, not only because it siphons off oil that normally would go to the United States, but also because the White House sees China as a rival and has done its best to elbow Peking out of the Middle East and Central Asia.
But Latin America is a different place than it was a decade ago when it was mired in debt, characterized by low growth, and beholden to the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank. When Rice told House members that the Bush administration was building a “united front” against Venezuela, it is likely to be a narrow front indeed.
Venezuela has helped bail Ecuador and Argentina out of debt, invested in projects in Bolivia, and is selling oil to Cuba at a deep discount. According to Greg Palast writing in The Progressive, Chavez has withdrawn $20 billion from the U.S. Federal Reserves, and “at the same time, lent or committed a like sum to Argentina, Ecuador, and other Latin American countries.”
Given Chavez's enormous popularity in his country and elsewhere in Latin America, it is hard to see what the White House can do about Venezuela's president. But that is not likely to discourage it from trying, and the people the administration has recruited to target him are just the kind of operatives who won't shy away from anything up to, and including, the unthinkable: assassination.
Conn Hallinan is a Foreign Policy In Focus (www.fpif.org) columnist.
|

|
|
|
Published by Foreign Policy In Focus (FPIF), a project of the Institute for Policy Studies (IPS, online at www.ips-dc.org). Copyright © 2008, Institute for Policy Studies.
Recommended citation:
Conn Hallinan, "Hunting Hugo" (Silver City, NM and Washington, DC: Foreign Policy In Focus, October 23, 2006).
Web location:
http://fpif.org/fpiftxt/3630
Production Information:
Author(s): Conn Hallinan
Editor(s): Emily Schwartz Greco, IPS
Production: Chellee Chase-Saiz, IRC |
|
Latest Comments & Conversation Area
Editor's Note: FPIF.org editors read and approve each comment.
Comments are checked for content only; spelling and grammar errors are not
corrected and comments that include vulgar language or libelous content are
rejected. |
| |
| Name: |
Olga Brumat |
Date: Oct 24, 2006 |
| I would like to tell the editor of this article that his knowledge of the situation in Venezuela is purely theoretical and does not correspond to the reality. He is probably getting his information from the different agencies that Hugo Chávez subsidizes around the world to create an image which is contrary to the one I, as a Venezuelan, who has lived through Chávez's eight years of disastrous governtment, has. We have a populist caudillo, no different from the previous South America has had in the past. Drunk with power and money from oil who wants to stay in power for ever! He is a dictator, who was elected thanks to a minority of 30% of voters in 1988, and one who has seized control of all the institutions. He controls the executive, the congress and the judicial power. It makes me sick to read papers who present him as the poor's defendant. Venezuela is in ruins and his people are more than ever poorer! |
|
| Name: |
Moss Fenberg |
Date: Oct 25, 2006 |
| Regarding the previous comment; It is without question contrary to american interests to have a man like Chavez in power when he's choosing not to bow to american interests, but I was certainly under the impression that he was doing much good in the world, investing in social programs, lending money and resources (oil) to economies that are in desperate need, etc. And I am repeadedly told in the media that he's beloved by the populace. If these assumptions are not true, and his rule has been disasterous as you say, please enlighten me further. Specifically, how has Venezuela been harmed by him.
|
|
| Name: |
gary |
Date: Oct 25, 2006 |
| I've heard a fair number of people like Olga say to my friends, "You've never lived in Venezuela -- Chavez is a disaster." These friends of mine, however, have lived in Venezuela, have toured the country, and have gathered information from all sides. Some of them have also lived in other places in Latin America, during periods of dirty war. Olga can apparently only guess and speculate what Conn Hallinan knows, or what Chavez wants, or what a real caudillo is like. I for one trust the consensus of international agencies who have affirmed that Venezuela's economy is growing, and poverty is declining. I also trust the Carter Center that human rights are well respected in Venezuela and that Chavez, whatever the turnout in 1988, has been legitimately elected in the most recent vote. I also believe from respected polling agencies that he remains extremely popular. I have read the Venezuelan Constitution, and the president does not have much formal power. If he controls the government, it is through his popularity and political skill. I know some Venezuelans are very upset with Chavez, but I just don't give them much credibility because they constantly say crazy things that when I try to independently verify them, turn out to be false. The opposition to Chavez has been extremely undemocratic, or they would have more respect for the will of the majority, and act more in concert with their own people, rather than the Bush administration. |
|
| Name: |
Sonia |
Date: Oct 27, 2006 |
| That last comment is also theoretical. I just came back from spending a while in Venezuela, and the words written by Olga are fantasy, though maybe her reality. It makes me sick when the priveledged speak for the poor. Let the poor speak for themselves. The people I know in Venezuela that are not Chavistas still know that the opposition is worse...unless they are from the elite class, who can't stand their loss of abilities to exploit. The elite opposition act as schoolchildren. "Im not gonna take part in this election if I cant win, wahhhhh." To some he may be a dictator, but if so, Bush is more so a dictator. I am not saying that Chavez is a Great President, but I do say that he is fostering programs that help empower and politicize the people, rather than leave them at the mercy of the global capitalists. |
|
| Name: |
Anthony St. John |
Date: Oct 29, 2006 |
| Hugo Chavez is the result of decades and decades of antagonism that has polarized Northamerica and Southamerica to such an extent there is now no turning back. For every action there is a reaction, and HC is that consequence stemming from the corruption and injustice that has burdened the majority of Southamericans who are now standing up more and more--unfortunately for many United States political administrations--to achieve what is right and what is right for them. You think the United States has problems in Iraq! Just wait! |
|
| Name: |
Marthe |
Date: Nov 13, 2006 |
| The very fact that Olga comments in English on this forum indicates that she is from the upper middle class in Venezuela--as the lower middle class and lower class have not studied English in bilingual private schools.
The social class to which Olga belongs is the bastion of opposition to the Chavez government, and the sector of the population which is the least democratic. I have spent the past 15 years in Latin America--part of that time in Venezuela--and I have personally seen and heard the persistently racist behavior of the Venezuelan opposition. It is an embarrassment to anyone with humanistic values.
Olga's comments, unfortunately, are typical: for them the country with the most dramatic economic growth in the hemisphere is in ruins. On a positive note, it's clear that the opposition is shrinking in numbers--ironically, because its members are prospering under Chavez.
In Mexico we should be so lucky.... |
|
| Name: |
luis |
Date: Nov 24, 2006 |
| Most opinions presented here are enormously biased, a lot of discussion has emerged from Hugo Chavez behavior. One must be honest to recognize this guy has had many achievements, but his most important one is DECEPTION. When he won the elections for the first time, venezuelan people were sick of their political class, and most of them were even sick about politics at all. Chavez made one simple promise at that time: "I will stop corruption". At that time he was only known for leading a bloody coup against president Carlos A. Perez, whom had become greatly unpopular because of his neo-liberal submission to world bank and other international financial institutions. Chavez never spoke about his friendship with Castro, Hussein, Daniel Ortega or Jatami and Ahmadinejad, He never said he liked comunism, he never said he planned on ruling Venezuela for 21 years, He never said he'd damage our relationships with Mexico, Colombia, Israel, Peru, the US, etc. He only promised to stop corruption and to bring social justice. In other words he deceived us, for we voted for him. Now he has taken control over the National Assembly, the Supreme Tribunal (Court), the Popular defense office, and most shocking of all the CNE (Electoral National Council)I'm not saying he hasn't done many good things, I strongly support his oil policy, the land distribution among the poor, health missions such as Barrio Adentro (Except for bringing cuban doctors), but I can't stand the idea of not being able to choose something different. Do not insult Venezuelan middle class, Chavez has done it quite well so far, he has called me a dog of imperialism, anti-nationalist, criminal, etc. He calls us that every day. Those of us who signed that we wanted a new president are denied many of our rights every day, It's True! The first thing they do when you seek a job in any goverment industry or office is to look you up in a list, and if you exercised you constitutional right of asking for a new president, they will ask you to leave. I know so, I've been through it and also have friends who work in official human resources departments. Knowing english doesn't mean we're better or worse it only means we've had access to more information than other people. But we fear for our future, we fear war, We fear the proven, well known relationship between Chavez and colombian guerrilla, we don't want cubans running our internal government, we don't want iranians living inside our military quarters. And Chavez hasn't stopped corruption, Poor people are stil poor, he has given them a few good things (burusas)in eight years of government, but they are still poor and unsafe. I dare to have a new president! |
|
| Name: |
Frank |
Date: Mar 31, 2007 |
| First, Hugo Chavez was elected overwhelmingly in 1998 not 1988.
Second, I am also a venezuelan who grew up in the slums of Caracas but, through an incredible effort by my parents, I was able to leave in 1992 when people were dying of hunger and the previous president, Carlos Andres Perez, bought new mansions in Miami. Thanks to IMF third world exploitative policies, the Venezuelan people awakened and found that through popular strenght they could gain political power.
Third, I visited Venezuela again last summer and I was pleasantly surprized by the massive public works projects taking place there, roads, subways, trolleys, footbal stadiums and not to mention millions of dollars being spent on education and healthcare for the poor. There is no doubt in my mind, and I have hundreds of family members in Venezuela who support this, that the great majority of Venezuelans greatly favor Chavez. While there is some fear that disidents are not allowed to speak enough, everyone clearly understands that this is the result of their own actions for not wanting to be objective participants in the political process and end the illegal atempts at ending the presidency. While the Venezuelan poor had to live over 20 years in silence, with no voice in the political process, Opposition leaders realize they are losing the political battle and resort to deceitful media practices and illegal coupt attempts.
Last, While I am certainly somewhat fearful of what could be with Chavez with so much power, I, along with the overwhelming majority of Venezuelans, rather take my chances with him than with the corrupt squandrals that are the opposition party. True some in chavez party lie and are corrupt, but their corruption is of a new kind that is not institutionalized, and at least there is attempts to bring it under control. |
|
| Discussion for this article has been closed. |
| |
Contact FPIF's webmaster with inquiries regarding the functionality of this website.
Copyright © 2008, Institute for Policy Studies.
|
|
|
|