There is reason to believe nuclear capability may make the chances of war worse in South Asia.
Just like during the cold war, the millions of dollars slated for our new allies in the war on terrorism have more to do with promoting American geostrategic interests than with protecting U.S. territory from external threats.
The United States' actions speak louder than words for Indian and Pakistani leaders.
With recent developments in U.S. nuclear weapons policy, the Bush administration has set an agenda that flagrantly ignores international law.
Why, all of a sudden, is India acting so belligerently and risking disaster?
President George W. Bush's speech on Monday represents a setback for Middle East peace.
Bush administration officials argue that the Indonesian army has reformed since the bad old days of two years ago and needs our help in its struggle against terrorism. They are wrong.
Congress should ensure effective public oversight of all training programs and resist President Bush's request to drop human rights considerations as a pre-condition to military aid.
The Bush administration would be wise to be gentle with the fabric that binds our world together.
While governments seem blind to the ways their policies enforce hunger and impoverishment for hundreds of millions of people, others see this harsh reality with clarity.