Divesting in countries that are in blatant violation of international and humanitarian law is not new, but with Israel, it needs to end.
As small Central Asian countries have struck military alliances with the United States, their leaders have asserted their own power more aggressively.
The United States has treated the region primarily as a convenient staging base for its Afghan campaign, and all regimes have felt confident enough to use the threat of Islamic fundamentalism and al Qaeda to continue in their old ways.
Palestine has scarce resources to face the enormous challenges in a struggle that has now continued for over five decades.
collapse of the Israeli-Palestinian peace talks at Camp David in the summer of 2000 and the subsequent Palestinian uprising
Republican Right and congressional liberals join together to show support for Sharon government despite reports by Amnesty and Human Rights Watch detailing gross human rights abuses.
In the United States and around the world, many are questioning why, despite some mild rebukes, Washington has maintained its large-scale military, financial, and diplomatic support for the Israeli occupation in the face of unprecedented violations of international law and human rights standards by Israeli occupation forces.
It is high time that the primacy of national health policy over international agreements, including the WTO, be restored.
Venezuela is not just another banana-oil republic; and the United States has, once again, deeply damaged itself in Latin America.
Until America finds its own voice in the Palestinian-Israeli dispute, it is unlikely that America's voice will be heard or heeded in the Arab world.