As President Clinton goes to Vietnam this week, he carries with him a heavy weight of legacy from Americas longest war.
Smirked the Statesman of Calcutta, "Foreigners are watching with bemusement the spectacle of Americans tying themselves up in knots over election results.
We should not accept, as fate, the feeling that, if our leaders do not lead, nothing can be done.
In the recent debate on permanent normal trade relations (PNTR) with China, some progressives argued that failure to ratify the bilateral deal would constitute a retreat into unilateralism.
Global poverty today is no longer a legacy of the past; the new global poverty is not only the direct consequence of globalization, but an integral part of it.
As in 1989, it was not the military prowess of the western alliance bringing freedom to an Eastern European country, but the power of nonviolent action by the subjugated peoples themselves.
There is a widespread assumption that resolution to the conflict between Israelis and Palestinians is an extremely complex issue, and that the United States has been and is the best hope for peace. The reality, however, is just the opposite.
If there is to be peace in the Middle East, the United States must exercise some "tough love."
The United States should certainly maintain its commitment to Israelâs legitimate security needs. What needs to be questioned is the Clinton administrationâs support for Israelâs ongoing occupation and its violations of basic human rights.
Despite years of UN-bashing in Washington, the global organization remains one of the most popular institutions among U.S. voters.