Regions / Middle East & North Africa
Three years after the invasion of Iraq, what have we learned?
If the U.S. attacks Iran - with nuclear or "conventional" bombs - it is virtually certain that Iranian retaliation will be swift and lethal.
The American people should question both the morality and the policy implications of what a permanent U.S. military presence brings to Iraq.
Nuclear proliferation can at best only be slowed down through a process of sanctions and double standards. The use of force shall serve to make other states believe that if only they had the bomb they would be safe. This way leads to catastrophe. The alternative, non-proliferation by cooperation and consent, cannot succeed as long as the United States is insistent on retaining and improving its nuclear arsenal and allowing its allies to have these weapons.
Double standards are revealed once again in terms of U.S. policy toward Israel and the Palestinian Authority.
Sense and nonsense in the Dubai World Ports controversy. Opposition to the Port purchase.
Even if an all out civil war is avoided now, it may not be as easy to avoid in the future if negotiations over either the formation of a coalition government or the constitutional settlement finally break down.
By blaming promordial hatred for the sectarian violence in Iraq, the Bush administration is ignoring the effects of the war and other decisions made by the United States during the occupation that have fueled the violence.
President George W. Bush will not withdraw our forces until U.S. oil companies have secure access to Iraq's resources.
An apology to the Danes.