Posts Tagged: chemical weapons
It is perhaps hackneyed to refer to Syria as a tinderbox or a powder keg, but that's exactly what it is.
A U.S. military attack on Syria will not be to protect civilians—it will mean taking sides once again in a bloody, complicated civil war.
Looks like the U.S. is once again reverting to its foreign-policy default position: bombing.
Let's resist the temptation to intervene in Syria. This time, let's say 'lesson learned.'
Is reflexive resistance to intervention in Syria the right reaction by progressives?
Why start another body count in a Middle East conflict with no direct relationship to U.S. security?
The United States is in no position to take leadership in response to any use of such weaponry by Syria
President Obama called their use a "game changer."
The Syrian government and the opposition trade accusations about using chemical weapons and propagandizing the attacks.
Israel is clearly taking advantage of a severely weakened Syrian regime, correctly predicting that the Syrians are not in a position to retaliate.