So Why Did Turkey Shoot Down That Russian Plane?


(Image: DonkeyHotey / Flickr)

Why did Turkey shoot down that Russian warplane?

It was certainly not because the SU-24 posed any threat. The plane is old and slow, and the Russians were careful not to arm it with anti-aircraft missiles. And it wasn’t because the Turks are quick on the trigger, either. Three years ago, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan emphatically declared that a “short-term violation of airspace can never be a pretext for an attack.” There are even some doubts about whether the Russian plane ever crossed into Turkey’s airspace at all.

Indeed, the whole November 24 incident looks increasingly suspicious, and one doesn’t have to be a paranoid Russian to think the takedown might have been an ambush. As retired Lt. Gen. Tom McInerney, former U.S. Air Force chief of staff, told Fox News, “This airplane was not making any maneuvers to attack the [Turkish] territory.” He called the Turkish action “overly aggressive” and concluded that the incident “had to be preplanned.”

It certainly puzzled the Israeli military, not known for taking a casual approach to military intrusions. Israeli Defense Minister Moshe Yaalon told the press on November 29 that a Russian warplane had violated the Israeli border over the Golan Heights. “Russian planes do not intend to attack us, which is why we must not automatically react and shoot them down when an error occurs.”

So why was the plane downed?

Perhaps because, for the first time in four years, some major players are tentatively inching toward a settlement of the catastrophic Syrian civil war, and powerful forces are maneuvering to torpedo that process. If the Russians hadn’t kept their cool, several nuclear-armed powers could well have found themselves in a scary faceoff, and any thoughts of ending the war would have gone a-glimmering.

A Short Score Card

There are multiple actors on the Syrian stage — and a bewildering number of crosscurrents and competing agendas that, paradoxically, make it both easier and harder to find common ground. Easier, because there is no unified position among the antagonists; harder, because trying to herd heavily armed cats is a tricky business.

A short score card on the players:

The Russians and the Iranians are supporting Syrian President Bashar al-Assad and fighting a host of extremist organizations ranging from al-Qaeda to the Islamic State, or ISIS. But each country has a different view of what a post-civil war Syria might look like. The Russians want a centralized and secular state with a big army. The Iranians don’t think much of “secular,” and they favor militias, not armies.

Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and most the other Gulf monarchies are trying to overthrow the Assad regime, and are the major supporters of the groups Russia, Iran, and Lebanon’s Hezbollah are fighting. But while Turkey and Qatar want to replace Assad with the Syrian Muslim Brotherhood, Saudi Arabia might just hate the Brotherhood more than it does Assad. And while the monarchies are not overly concerned with the Kurds, Turkey is bombing them, and they’re a major reason why Ankara is so deeply enmeshed in Syria.

The U.S., France, and the United Kingdom are also trying to overthrow Assad, but are currently focused on fighting ISIS using the Kurds as their major allies — specifically the Syrian Kurdish Democratic Party, an offshoot of the Turkish Kurdish Workers Party that the U.S. officially designates as “terrorist.” These are the same Kurds that the Turks are bombing and who have a friendly alliance with the Russians.

Indeed, Turkey may discover that one of the price tags for shooting down that SU-24 is the sudden appearance of new Russian weapons for the Kurds, some of which will be aimed at the Turks.

A Suspension of Rational Thought

The Syrian war requires a certain suspension of rational thought.

For instance, the Americans are unhappy with the Russians for bombing the anti-Assad Army of Conquest, a rebel alliance dominated by the Nusra Front, al-Qaeda’s franchise in Syria. That would be the same al-Qaeda that brought down the World Trade Center towers and that the U.S. is currently bombing in Yemen, Somalia, and Afghanistan.

Suspension of rational thought is not limited to Syria.

A number of Arab countries initially joined the U.S. air war against the Islamic State and al-Qaeda, because both organizations are pledged to overthrow the Gulf monarchies. But Saudi Arabia, Jordan, the United Arab Emirates, and Qatar have now dropped out to concentrate their air power on bombing the Houthis in Yemen.

The Houthis, however, are by far the most effective force fighting ISIS and al-Qaeda in Yemen. Both extremist organizations have made major gains in the last few weeks because the Houthis are too busy defending themselves to take them on.

Moves Toward a Settlement

In spite of all this political derangement, however, there are several developments that are pushing the sides toward some kind of peaceful settlement that doesn’t involve regime change in Syria. That is exactly what the Turks and the Gulf monarchs are worried about, and a major reason why Ankara shot down that Russian plane.

The first of these developments has been building throughout the summer: a growing flood of Syrians fleeing the war. There are already almost 2 million in Turkey, over a million each in Jordan and Lebanon, and as many as 900,000 in Europe. Out of 23 million Syrians, some 11 million have been displaced by the war, and the Europeans are worried that many of those 11 million people will end up camping out on the banks of the Seine and the Ruhr. If the war continues into next year, that’s an entirely plausible prediction.

Hence, the Europeans have quietly shelved their demand that Assad resign as a prerequisite for a ceasefire and are leaning on the Americans to follow suit. The issue is hardly resolved, but there seems to be general agreement that Assad will at least be part of a transition government. At this point, the Russians and Iranians are insisting on an election in which Assad would be a candidate because both are wary of anything that looks like “regime change.” The role Assad might play will be a sticking point, but probably not an insurmountable one.

Turkey and Saudi Arabia are adamant that Assad must go, but neither of them is in the driver’s seat these days. While NATO supported Turkey in the Russian plane incident, according to some of the Turkish press, many of its leading officials consider Erdogan a loose cannon. And Saudi Arabia — whose economy has been hard hit by the worldwide fall in oil prices — is preoccupied by its Yemen war, which is turning into a very expensive quagmire.

Russia’s Role

The second development is the Russian intervention, which appears to have changed things on the ground, at least in the north, where Assad’s forces were being hard pressed by the Army of Conquest. New weapons and airpower have dented a rebel offensive and resulted in some gains in the government’s battle for Syria’s largest city, Aleppo.

Russian bombing also took a heavy toll on the Turkmen insurgents in the Bayir-Bucak region, the border area that Turkey has used to infiltrate arms, supplies, and insurgents into Syria.

The appearance of the Russians essentially killed Turkey’s efforts to create a “no fly zone” on its border with Syria, a proposal that the U.S. has never been enthusiastic about. Washington’s major allies, the Kurds, are strongly opposed to a no fly zone because they see it as part of Ankara’s efforts to keep the Kurds from forming an autonomous region in Syria.

The Bayir-Bucak area and the city of Jarabulus are also the exit point for Turkey’s lucrative oil smuggling operation, apparently overseen by one of Erdogan’s sons, Bilal. The Russians have embarrassed the Turks by publishing satellite photos showing miles of tanker trucks picking up oil from ISIS-controlled wells and shipping it through Turkey’s southern border with Syria.

“The oil controlled by the Islamic State militants enters Turkish territory on an industrial scale,” Russian President Vladimir Putin said November 30. “We have every reason to believe that the decision to down our plane was guided by a desire to ensure the security of this oil’s delivery routes to ports.”

Erdogan and NATO

Erdogan didn’t get quite the response he wanted from NATO following the shooting down of the SU-24. While the military alliance backed Turkey’s defense of its “sovereignty,” NATO then called for a peaceful resolution and de-escalation of the whole matter.

At a time when Europe needs a solution to the refugee crisis — and wants to focus its firepower on the organization that killed 130 people in Paris — NATO cannot be happy that the Turks are dragging them into a confrontation with the Russians, making the whole situation a lot more dangerous than it was before the November 24 incident.

The Russians have now deployed their more modern SU-34 bombers and armed them with air-to-air missiles. The bombers will now also be escorted by SU-35 fighters. The Russians have also fielded S-300 and S-400 anti-aircraft systems, the latter with a range of 250 miles. The Russians say they’re not looking for trouble, but they’re loaded for bear should it happen.

Would a dustup between Turkish and Russian planes bring NATO — and four nuclear armed nations — into a confrontation? That possibility ought to keep people up at night.

Coming to the Table

Sometime around the New Year, the countries involved in the Syrian civil war will come together in Geneva. A number of those will do their level best to derail the talks, but one hopes there are enough sane — and desperate — parties on hand to map out a political solution.

It won’t be easy, and who gets to sit at the table has yet to be decided. The Turks will object to the Kurds; the Russians, Iranians, and Kurds will object to the Army of Conquest; and the Saudis will object to Assad. In the end it could all come apart. It’s not hard to torpedo a peace plan in the Middle East.

But if the problems are great, failure will be catastrophic. That may be the glue that keeps the parties together long enough to hammer out a ceasefire, an arms embargo, a new constitution, and internationally supervised elections.

Foreign Policy In Focus columnist Conn Hallinan can be read at Dispatches from the Edge and the Middle Empire Series.

  • Marcus77

    Russian leaders are Hypocrites. They have done the same in Eastern Ukraine ,Georgia in 2008 to protect their minorities and out right annexed the Crimea . and Turks are not allowed to intervene? when over 3 million refugees Syrians lives inside Turkey cost Turkish government over $8 billion over 6 years and 2 million Turkmen’s are displaced and trying to hold their ground not jumping on boats to Europe ,what would Russia do if Ukraine invite a foreign power and their jets fly over Donesk and bomb Russian minorities and violate the Russian air space?just because Russia is a nuclear power have right to be hypocritical and Turks can not, maybe Turks got to make few hundreds of nukes , maybe than Russia will back off.
    Russia is an enemy of US, don’t you ever forget that guys, they would undermine all US interest in the World if they could

    • mosquitoguy

      Assad controls only 15% of Syria, ruling over Alawites and Christians. You’re delusional if you believe those anti-Assad rebels are trying to topple him in order to “liberate” the Alawites and Christians. For the most part, those people *want* Assad to stay in power because otherwise the Sunni Muslims will kill them. The anti-Assad forces want power, and after Assad goes down they will fight each other. You’re also delusional in thinking Turkey is a US/NATO ally. Erdogan is a Sunni dictator– what he wants is Sunni Turks controlling Syria, and Turkey is willing to arm ISIS in order to topple Assad, because ISIS are also Sunnis.
      If the US/EU want to destroy ISIS, they need to pick a Shia ally who will *never* make peace with Sunnis— that means Russia and Iran, not Saudi Arabia/Qatar who don’t have any issues with ISIS, which is why they’re focusing their war in Yemen instead. As far as this rhetoric of, “Russia is an enemy of US,” stop being a sentimental girl.

      • furrrball

        First rational reply i have yet to see. All these other role players need to go home. Syria is not a shopping center for everyone to loot from. The USA and others have no business in Syria. Does any other country just invade and bomb the USA? Ohhhh no, they don’t. This is a travesty and crime to humanity on a grand scale.

        • mosquitoguy

          The USA have business in Syria as much as the Saudis have business in Yemen. The fact is, nations will invade other nations if their interests are threatened. This is why no western nation invades an African country because no one has interests there. The idea of “national sovereignty” is a superficial, geopolitical construction — it’s another way of saying, “I’m happy with what I have now– stay off my lawn everyone,” but those who have interests in your lawn will step on it in the name of “global stability.” Anyone who cries “national sovereignty” is just doing lip service. There is no way the US will let Syria alone and let ISIS grow to expand its caliphate out of “respect” for its citizens — this is plain stupidity. Syria no longer exists because its government can’t maintain its borders, so everything in it is up for grabs. The question of migrants is moot as long as you have factions fighting for power (i.e. not just Assad).

        • bugs thumper

          Everyone has business in everyone elses country. A country is a border that marks the right of the soveriegn to tax the people living within this border. Humans are nomadic by nature and will trade with anyone from anywhere.

    • Ghua

      yeah, sure they did the same to eastern ukraine, lol. wake up!

    • Mister Hill

      Wake up and smell reality you fool

    • bugs thumper

      As are all leaders. No one country is “better” or more “ethical” than another. Countries by their very nature exploit the environment and abuse people as resources. There are only a few exceptions to this rule.

    • Ding Bat

      What nonsense are you talking? It took 6 yrs for refugees to accumulate in turkey because of US sanctions and US support of ISIS. don’t forget US sucking Saudi balls to over throw Assad. The real enemy of the world is USA which is poking its nose in South China Sea which will be a good place to sink all US ships. You should be licking Putin’s boots and electing him for world leader.

  • Vishwas Patil

    Is Syria so strategic that billions are spent, millions displaced or killed? Just egos and personal ambitions making life miserable for the hapless. Main criminal seems to be Saudi.

  • Kimfehrlich1

    persecution on par with being thrown to the lions in gladiator pits, while paying fo

  • Kimfehrlich1

    persecution on par with being thrown to the lions in g paying fo

  • Kimfehrlich1

    persecution on par with being thrown to the lions in glad, while paying fo

  • Kimfehrlich1

    persecution on par with being thrown to the lions in gladile paying fo

  • Kimfehrlich1

    persecution on par with being thrown to the lions in gle paying fo

  • Kimfehrlich1

    persecution on par with being thrown to the lions in gladiatorpaying fo

  • Kimfehrlich1

    persecution on par with being thrown to the lions in gle paying fo

  • Kimfehrlich1

    persecution on par with being thrown to the lions in e paying fo

  • Kimfehrlich1

    persecution on par with being thrown to the lions in gladia paying fo

  • Kimfehrlich1

    persecution on par with being thrown to the lions in gladiator pits, while paying fo

  • Kimfehrlich1

    persecution on par with being thrown to the lions in gladiator pitsaying fo

  • Kimfehrlich1

    persecution on par with being thrown to the lions in gladiate paying fo

  • Kimfehrlich1

    persecution on par with being thrown to thions in gladiator pits, while paying fo

  • charlesjannuzi

    I think it was meant to be revenge for a Turkish plane or helicopter that Syria had earlier shot down. They assumed that this older fighter – attack plane was Syrian.