A substantial part of that re-invention is the capacity to ask tough questions of powerful officials.
A substantial part of that re-invention is the capacity to ask tough questions of powerful officials.
The U.S. does not wish to be seen as responsible for “losing” Egypt to Islamists in the coming elections.
Ostensibly Pakistani forces fired upon joint NATO-Afghan forces.
How U.S. forces might operate in Iran can only be left to the imagination.
The Egyptian military is using tear gas on protestors in Tahrir Square that’s made in the U.S.A.
Even if sequestration cuts across all military programs, this sort of ham-handed approach is safely doable.
While Iran digs deeper to protect its uranium enrichment facilities, the United States develops ever larger bombs to destroy them.
Focusing on the impartial problems that nuclear weapons create for their possessors might be of more benefit in ratcheting down tensions between Israel and Iran than belittling their genuine security concerns.
If Rick Perry and conservatives would were to get their wish and shut down the Department of Energy, the National Nuclear Security Administration would go with it.
Our country’s existing jobs program goes by many names: The Permanent War Economy, Military Keynesianism, The Iron Triangle, Perpetual War. The real question it raises is not whether the government should spend. It is whether the government has been spending well.