America’s divide-and-rule strategy in the Middle East has backfired.

America’s divide-and-rule strategy in the Middle East has backfired.
U.S. officials believe that China is vulnerable to its dependency on the region’s oil.
If you thought the polarization of politics in the United States was corrosive, brace yourself for the even more corrosive polarization of geopolitics.
Withdrawing several thousand U.S. troops from Afghanistan is just the tip of the iceberg.
It will likely use a combination of hard and soft power utilizing diplomacy, coalition building, political pressure, and military power.
Egypt’s President Morsi made Time’s short list for the person of the year, but his inability to steer Egypt to safety after his election cost him the accolade.
The United States should consider taking China up on its four-point peace plan for Syria.
In his first term, President Barack Obama’s vision for the Middle East failed to materialize. If he wants to make a lasting mark during his second term, he must ensure that U.S. policy in the region is no longer dictated by energy sources, friendly dictators, and Israel.
For decades U.S. presidents have shown a willingness to hold hands with just about anyone for the price of oil.
It seems bizarre that right-wing pundits would be so desperate to use the recent anti-American protests in the Middle East—in most cases numbering only a few hundred people and in no cases numbering more than two or three thousand—as somehow indicative of why the United States should oppose greater democracy in the Middle East.