Killing civilians is hardly drones’ only crime.
Killing civilians is hardly drones’ only crime.
A more accurate bellwether of the tide turning in Syria will be if Russia decides it no longer needs President Assad.
Now that the talks with Iran on its nuclear program appear to be on the ropes, are we on the road to war? The Israelis threaten it almost weekly, and the Obama administration has reportedly drawn up an attack plan. But in a sense, we are already at war with Iran.
It is in Turkey’s best interest to act as negotiator between the hostile parties and move to the forefront of the peace-plan effort.
Despite its close cooperation with the IDF in arresting suspected militants, the PA does not even have total control of its own funds or its security forces.
There’s a delay between the events on the ground that a drone is target and what a drone operator sees on the screen.
Veterans struggle to come to terms with the possible immorality of their actions in war.
The United States has been funding Syria opposition groups since 2005.
To Iran, uranium enrichment is mainly intended as a bargaining chip.
In a recent interview, the eminent geo-strategist Ian Bremmer suggested that a “nuclear-armed Iran” is inevitable because, in an emerging “G-Zero World” where no single bloc of countries can dominate international affairs, the emerging powers can frustrate the West’s efforts to thwart Tehran’s nuclear ambitions. But recent years have given lie to this argument.