This Changes Everything: A Simpler Solution to Climate Change

naomi-klein-this-changes-everything

Naomi Klein’s “This Changes Everything”

Even if climate science is complicated, author Naomi Klein wants you to know that finding a solution to global warming is easy.

In her powerful new book, This Changes Everything: Capitalism vs. the Climate, the Canadian globalization expert drills through the noisy climate debate and finds that humanity has no choice but to ditch its fossil fuel-driven global economy for a local model powered by renewable energy.

Out with oil, gas, and coal. In with wind, sun, small-scale hydro, and other things that don’t make the climate problem worse. Period.

Throughout the book, Klein sticks to her promise to stay out of the scientific weeds. And she doesn’t force readers to bone up on complicated programs — like the Clean Development Mechanism and REDD+ — that are currently failing to reduce the carbon that factories, cars, trucks, and massive farms are belching into the atmosphere.

For Klein, only “a mass movement capable of taking on powerful polluters” can end the madness of increasingly toxic fossil fuel extraction. Without broad-based mobilization, revamping the economy to veer off today’s course toward cataclysmic floods, fires, and drought may prove impossible.

Official efforts to slow global warming, she explains, took “what began as a straightforward debate about shifting away from fossil fuels and put it through a jargon generator so convoluted that the entire climate issue would seem too complex and arcane for non-experts to understand.”

That “jargon generator” also obscures the fact that most climate efforts cling to the lie that everyone can win in this struggle — from ExxonMobil and Shell to the polar bears and caribou.

Doesn’t that sound absurd? But this delusion triggered market-friendly “solutions” likecarbon trading.

That arrangement, often called “cap and trade,” lets companies keep on polluting in exchange for paying off someone else to refrain from, say, chopping down a forest on a remote island. Not only does selling the right to pollute not work, it can disrupt low-carbon lifestyles that are doing the least to stoke climate change.

The fact is that climate-altering carbon emissions are still climbing after 25 years of global climate negotiations. They attained record levels in 2013 despite rapid growth in the generation of electricity from wind and solar power.

“The failure of this polite strategy is beyond debate,” Klein declares. Yet politicians, bureaucrats, and billionaires won’t let go of it.

Klein’s fly-on-the-wall view of a “geoengineering” conference is one of the book’s most chilling passages. For the uninitiated, that’s the “science” of manipulating the weather by tampering with clouds or the ocean. Geoengineers want to “hack the planet” because they believe human beings can reverse the warming effects of all that excess carbon by, say, simulating volcanic eruptions.

She dismisses this “geoclique” (Klein sometimes coins her own jargon) as “crammed with overconfident men prone to complimenting each other on their fearsome brainpower.” And she rejects that notion that Richard Branson — who promised to spend $3 billion fighting climate change and wound up investing less than $300 million — or any other “green billionaire” will save the day.

Klein has more faith in the people on the frontlines of the new climate movement, and meets up with them everywhere from Greece to Montana. Many of these folks who are defending their homelands from increasingly extreme forms of drilling, mining, and burning will participate in what’s certain to prove the biggest climate demonstration to date in New York City.

While Klein does call for overhauling the entire global economy — no minor challenge — and rejects most market-based climate fixes, she doesn’t shoot down all financial responses to climate change.

“There is plenty of room to make a profit in a zero-carbon economy,” she says. The solutions Klein favors would reduce inequality and make the economy generally more equitable. She also embraces efforts to get institutions and individuals to divest from their oil, gas, and coal holdings while investing in more sustainable energy options.

But, Klein warns: “The profit motive is not going to be the midwife for that great transformation.” Instead, it will take millions or even billions of people working together.

Are you ready?

Emily Schwartz Greco is the managing editor of OtherWords, a non-profit national editorial service run by the Institute for Policy Studies.

  • Bluhorizons

    Climate change is not the result of pollution, both are the result of over-population. We do not have too many cars and stuff that pollute–we have too much of everything. The sea is being emptied of fish. Fresh water is becoming scarce. Our agricultural methods provide ever-more food which only creates ever more people. What good will pollution control do, if during that process another two billion people enter the world?

    Time for some changes. Time to mandate every teacher in the world to teach kids that small families are good for the earth and big families are bad. Time to stop giving tax breaks for big families. They should be penalised. The breaks should go to small families. Tine to tie aid to birth control. Time to tell religious people who oppose birth control that they are killing the planet. They often say, “God will provide.” And He has. He has given us the brains to save ourselves.

    • robertwgordonesq

      At the risk of sounding cynical…people who really think there are too many people on the planet have the option and obligation of removing themselves from it. That would seem to be the only logically consistent position.

      Too often, cries of “there are too many people” becomes a euphemism for “there are too many [brown, Asian, African, or generally non-white] people” and is thus clandestine talk for “benevolent” genocide.

      The proven solution for over population is more economic development, not less. The statistics show that developed countries naturally and drastically reduce their populations without coercion or socialistic government intrusion.

  • GEF

    Thank you Naomi!

    Your talents express with clear language of our disputed and or destroyed works. The literature’s perspective will attract to assure change as heal many from confused conflict.

    UNFCCC arrives 2015 to ratify the Paris Protocol while this communication tool comforts to exploit obstacles and threats of the endangered future generations essential requirements, a healthy Earth.

    Already affirmed evident Barack Obama’s pentagon has a chilling draft and Vladimir Putin’s ‘G-7’ convicts the International Criminal Court of negligence upon human rights. Notably additional, the former USSR region has generally reduced Co2 emissions, unlike the refuted others.

    Good work, sincerely.