Paul Brannan of the Institute for Science and International Security clings to belief that Vyacheslav Danilenko was assisting Iran with nuclear-weapons research at Parchin.
They say that it’s only in hard times that you really see who your true friends are. What separates opportunistic partnership from genuine alliance isn’t necessarily treaties, but a willingness among both parties to hang onto their relationship when the going gets tough.
WASHINGTON, Mar 8, 2012 (IPS) – This week was supposed to be all about Iran – at least, that’s how Israel and its powerful U.S. lobby, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), had planned it – and why the U.S. should prepare to bomb it very, very soon if its leadership doesn’t cave into Western demands to abandon its nuclear programme.
Israeli “We Love Iranians” campaign spawns imitators.
Why do human rights activists and lonesome Internet commentators suffer the wrath of the U.S. government while politicians are allowed to accept large sums to advocate for a terrorist group like MEK?
Led astray by conventional wisdom about Iran? We’re here to help.
It’s difficult to determine whether or not the Institute for Science and International Security is driven by politics.
Israel fears that its role as regional kingpin would be threatened if Iran developed nuclear weapons.
An Iran bomb would change the balance of power in the Middle East.
The Obama administration’s attempts to punish Iran for its nuclear activities have had the unintended effect of causing strains in the US-India relationship.