Even some critiques of Donald Trump’s Muslim ban contain unfortunate stereotypes.
Even some critiques of Donald Trump’s Muslim ban contain unfortunate stereotypes.
When it came to race, climate, or diplomacy, Obama was like a visitor from the future. On trade and intervention, however, he was often stuck in the past.
The U.S. responded to a barbaric attack that killed 3,000 U.S. civilians with an ongoing barbaric air campaign of their own that’s since produced “towers” of dead civilians in the Greater Middle East and Africa.
“Smart power at its best,” as Hillary Clinton called our intervention into Libya, doesn’t seem like much of an improvement over the heavy-handed use of force.
Most Americans are oblivious to the suffering we have caused to the people of Libya.
The public is sick of Benghazi, but Hillary Clinton may be culpable for Libya’s implosion.
The U.S.-Cuba deal proved the value of discreet, informal diplomacy. No shortage of other peace processes could begin the same way.
Such a vacuum has enabled the Islamic State to become a magnet for unemployed young men throughout the Middle East and North Africa.
City by city, state by state, the Middle East is being laid to waste — and then we’re bombing the rubble.
That is, if concern for the fate of fellow tyrants like Syrian President Assad makes him a sensitive guy.