Can Hillary Clinton’s advocacy of the use of force be chalked up to her affection for members of the military?
Can Hillary Clinton’s advocacy of the use of force be chalked up to her affection for members of the military?
As the Paris climate deal nears implementation, the possibilities for corporate subterfuge are endless. But the real problem may be our own lifestyles.
Donald Trump is the first person to run openly and without apology on a platform of American decline.
Military contractors have shelled out over $1 million to the 2016 presidential candidates — including over $200,000 to Hillary Clinton alone.
A U.S. return to bilateral hostilities with Russia is a costly diversion from both nations’ security needs in a multilateral world.
Many of the GOP front-runner’s worst proposals are playing out already.
One of the seedier tax tricks of U.S. corporations has been to merge with foreign firms — without actually moving their operations overseas.
Saudi support for the 9/11 hijackers should preclude a relationship between the U.S. and Saudi governments.
Donald Trump’s calls for arming Seoul and Tokyo with nuclear weapons seems to be his way of keeping American troops out of the line of nuclear fire.
When the president wants to fulfill a constitutional duty — like nominating a Supreme Court justice — Congress is up in arms. When he launches a blatantly unconstitutional war, it shrugs.