Reducing a humanitarian crisis to an issue of “border security” puts real solutions out of reach.
Reducing a humanitarian crisis to an issue of “border security” puts real solutions out of reach.
Many would-be migrants, like the Garifuna, would love nothing more than to stay in our homes. It’s Washington that’s making it difficult.
Migrants are hit long before they migrate, before they reach the border, and often long after they cross it.
In the face of extractive industries’ enormous economic clout, Central Americans are facing increasing displacement and threats to their democratic rights.
Outsourcing migration control to authoritarian regimes has proven costly, insidious, and common for Global North governments.
The factors that drive displacement are often complex, but welcoming refugees isn’t.
Trump’s asylum ban and kangaroo tent courts threaten to destroy a pillar of international humanitarian law. What can we do?
Lawmakers say frontline communities should be at the heart of the Green New Deal. They must include current and future undocumented immigrants.
It’s about asking whether we need an immigration system that terrorizes the least dangerous people in this country.
There’s nothing “uncontrollable” about people applying for asylum. All the U.S. has to do is meet its obligations under international law.